• Advertisement

Nikon Buckmaster vs Leupold VXII

Whats happening in your neck of the woods ?

Nikon Buckmaster vs Leupold VXII

Postby Abolt » Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:21 pm

I know the opinions on this topic will probably be split right down the middle but what the heck. I currently have a Nikon Monarch 3.5-10X50 scope on my 7 Mag and it is a very good scope. I need to put a new scope on my 270 and I am leaning towards a Nikon Buckmaster 3x9x50, but I am also considering a Leupold VXII 3x9x50. I know there are bound to be some folks on here who have used one or both of these. I have never really heard anything negative about either one so let's hear yout opinions.

Thanks
Abolt
button buck
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: Jackson

Postby bt58 » Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:51 pm

I've got a Buckmasters 4.5-14x40 on my 270 and I like it...picks up light real well. If it was me I'd go with the Buckmasters because I believe you're getting as good of a scope for less money.
User avatar
bt58
12 Point
 
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:00 am
Location: Brandon, MS

Postby gtk » Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:31 pm

currently i have nikon 3x9x40. its 20+ years old. (Alan, its the same gun/scope combo I had in Highschool thru college) . My next scope will be a 3x9x50 probably. I have a Leupold fixed 4x 40mm on my 22mag. Both scopes have held up well over the years.

The other day, I saw where someone posted on another site that Walmart had marked down the buckmaster scope to $79.00 at their store.

Personally you probably couldnt go wrong with either. I'd pick the one with the best price :)
User avatar
gtk
Admin
 
Posts: 19140
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS

Postby Abolt » Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:48 pm

You sure got your moneys worth out of that scope didn't you Greg? The scope I am replacing on my 270 is an old Redfield that I have had on my gun since college. it served it's purpose, but it just does not cut it anymore.
Abolt
button buck
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: Jackson

Postby nobucks » Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:42 pm

I have one of both and I think they are both good scopes.I got vx3 on my 270 and the nikon on my 7mm08.
User avatar
nobucks
12 Point
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: panola co.

Postby Stinger » Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:13 pm

You can't go wrong with either scope but I replaced my old Leupold with a Zeiss 3.5X10X50 last season... :wink:
Rich

Kill swiftly, Waste nothing, Offer no apologies !!!
User avatar
Stinger
button buck
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:29 pm
Location: Houma, Louisiana

Postby DavidT » Thu Aug 18, 2005 6:10 pm

I currently own Both scopes, and have no complaints with either. I may put a Nikon on the Ruger #1 that I just got. :D
Be careful who you step on while you're trying to claw your way to the top, You never know who you might meet on the way back down!
DavidT
Charter Member
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:27 pm
Location: Foley, AL

Postby hungryhuntergirl » Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:26 pm

I had a nikon buckmasters 3-9x40, and I bought a Leupold VX II 3-9-50, and I like it much better. It picks up light a lot better (of course the obj is bigger) but I like my leupold!!
There is room for all gods creatures right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy!!
User avatar
hungryhuntergirl
Long-Nosed Nanny
 
Posts: 2211
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 6:57 pm
Location: vicksburg

leupold vs nikon

Postby cooper » Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:23 pm

i have a leupold 3 x 9 x50 Variax II on my 300 mag, have had it on for several years, and have no complaints. I just put a Variax III 3.5 x 10 x 50 on my Encore 7mm-08, I liked it so much I just put one my Omega, they cost a little more but I think they are better, but thats just opinion
cooper
button buck
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Picayune


Return to Whitetail Deer Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests